Wednesday, July 18, 2007

The Problem with Running. The Problem with Life.

“When the Bible says that God sticks with us, the emphasis is on this dependable personal relationship, that he is always there for us…that he ‘sticks with us’ is the reason Christians can look back over a long life crisscrossed with cruelties, unannounced tragedies, unexpected setbacks, sufferings, disappointments, depressions—look back across all that and see it as a road of blessing, and make a song out of what we see. ..God sticks to his relationship. He establishes a personal relationship with us and stays with it. The central reality for Christians is the personal, unalterable, persevering commitment God makes to us. Perseverance is not the result of our determination, it is the result of God’s faithfulness. We survive in the way of faith not because we have extraordinary stamina but because God is righteous, because God sticks with us. Christian discipleship is a process of paying more and more attention to God’s righteousness and less and less attention to our own.”

-Eugene Peterson, A Long Obedience in the Same Direction


"You have to forget your last marathon before you try another. Your mind can't know what's coming."


- Frank Shorter, 1972 Olympic Marathon champion (gold medal)

Throughout history, running has been compared to life. The apostle Paul uses the analogy in the Bible. I think about the comparison every day. I haven't trained in a while. I've gained back 15 pounds since the Country Music Marathon. I'm injured (left calf). I don't like my new shoes and don't have the discretionary funds to replace them. I'm not motivated.


I could write a similar paragraph about life.


These two quotes have come at an opportune time. May the truth inside them--about life
and running--motivate me today.

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

Well-Said In an Immodest World


A different type of porn

The Four F’s — Food, Fashion, Fitness and Finances — masquerade as news, blotting out information we really need.

By Robert Lipsyte

I am sick and tired of pornography, and I'm not going to read it anymore. Furthermore, if I see you indulging in porn, I am going to snatch the paper out of your hands, turn off your TV or pull the plug on your computer. It's the only way to stop this toxic porn slick from oozing through the American brain and drowning it.

(Illustration by Web Bryant)

Now, it's not the sex stuff I'm talking about here; that battlefield is crowded, and the war may already be lost. And I'm not even sure that consensual adult tanglings are as dangerous as what I call the Four F's of porn — Food, Fashion, Fitness and Finances. They are insidious because they masquerade as news you can use while crowding out the genuine information we need to make informed decisions.

Food Porn makes me sick to my stomach. It's either puff pieces about expensive restaurant repasts created by artiste chefs and washed down with pricey wines whose grapes were squeezed by naked blind monks on hillsides owned by movie stars, or very cheap restaurant meals (say, 5,000 calories of sugar and soy for 99 cents) that can be washed down by chemicals with a fizz — fun food for folks near the poverty level.

People who spend more than $50 for a meal should be detained for indecent consumption, and parents who allow their kids to hate broccoli should be arrested for child abuse.

When fashion is lewd

If you really hate all food, you could become a dealer of Fashion Porn, which seems to start on the red carpet of all those celebrity parades where mostly too-skinny women show off dresses, which they got to wear for free, by designers who will make cheap knockoffs for regular-sized people. The genius of Fashion Porn is that the boutique dress you had to have last year now marks you as a loser, and that also goes for middle-class-priced sneakers, T-shirts, boots and jackets.

Anybody who judges people by their lapels or their labels should be locked up for lewdness.

The sweaty little secret of Fitness Porn is that it came about because a lot of people don't do much for themselves any more. Since they don't chase after their own kids, clean their own houses or mow their own lawns, their blood turns to sludge and their muscles to marshmallow. So they have to be seduced into shaking their booties with trendy exercises in chic gyms while wearing stylish workout gear (tie-in to Fashion Porn). Some of the newer exercise programs — such as power yoga and aerobic boxing — are beyond oxymoronic; they subvert the purpose of those ancient basic activities.

If you want to get fit, after you eat your fruits and vegetables, put on inexpensive, low-logo shoes and old clothes and take a long, energetic walk. Afterward, lift a heavy book in each hand while stretching. Or clean your house, mow your lawn and chase after your kids.

The worst porn of all may be Financial Porn because it can make you covetous, greedy and depressed. The flow of other people's cash should be as private as the flow of their bodily fluids. I hate reading about what lottery winners are going to do with the $10 million they just won (quit delivering the mail, buy a house for Mom, take a cruise), and I hate reading how unhappy they are a year later because all their cousins showed up with hands out.

And those stories about CEOs and hedge fund managers who make millions a year rarely tell us exactly what it is they do. I wouldn't be surprised if the companies they run and finance are behind the F-Porn sites, which push their products; they earn their big bucks by hiring the PR hacks to lobby lazy reporters to convince us that this is worth our attention.

The only Financial Porn story that touched me in recent years was the one about a million-dollar lottery winner who asked for his prize in a lump sum instead of 20 annual payments so he could spend it on an experimental cancer treatment. The lottery officials refused, and he died. If the tale is true (after all, it was a Financial Porn story), the officials should be sentenced to life in spandex on an exercycle eating mad cow burgers.

Eclipsing the real news

Since there's only so much media shelf space, the F-Porn sites, which are hardly news, squeeze out what used to be called "hard" news. Maybe it's a conspiracy and maybe it's a coincidence, but as F-Porn expands across the shelf, the information we need to know about the political process, the conduct of the war, the state of the environment, health care and education becomes harder and harder to find.

Now, isn't that obscene?

Robert Lipsyte is a member of USA TODAY's board of contributors.

Religious. Free. Opinionated.

Blogger's Note: Here are two interesting op-ed pieces from USAToday.

Remember the religious heritage of the USA

Kylee A. Gustafson - Great Bend, Kan.

Without some religious belief where would the United States be now? Our Founding Fathers believed in God, and many held Christian beliefs. Even our Pledge of Allegiance says the United States is "one nation under God" ("Remain religion-free," Letters, July 3).


(Illustration by Sam Ward, USA TODAY)

Surprisingly, few have been too offended by our country's religious roots. If our government officials didn't have any religious beliefs or morals, I think our nation would be much worse than it is now.

God set the rules that have been used to govern this nation since the 1700s when the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution were signed. These documents were signed by people from many religious backgrounds, including Episcopalian/Anglicans, Presbyterians, Congregationalists, Quakers, Dutch/German Reformists, Lutherans, Catholics and Methodists.

Maybe our nation wasn't meant to adopt any one faith.

Nonetheless, the belief of USA TODAY reader Benjamin Iglar-Mobley that putting a cross on a monument honoring the military "violates separation of church and state" isn't true —especially because the country our troops have been fighting for was founded by people who believed in God.

Who are any of us to say exactly what those servicemembers have been fighting for? To deny our religious heritage is an insult to the people who worked so hard to found this nation.

Respect Christian patriots

Stephen Almy, Chairman, Task Force Patriot USA - Lawrenceville, Ga.

Tom Krattenmaker's commentary "Faith shouldn't be red, white and blue" leaves a lot of questions ("On Religion," The Forum, July 2).

He writes that we must keep a "reverent measure of distance between" religion and patriotism.

Does he mean that religious people shouldn't be patriotic? Or does he mean patriots should not be religious?

In his commentary, Krattenmaker mentions the Christian organization I chair, called Task Force Patriot USA. My organization participated in a celebration on Memorial Day weekend at Stone Mountain Park in Georgia, where we honored our troops.

Krattenmaker writes that "a cross-themed celebration of the military is harmless next to jihadists who kill in the name of religion." I'm glad he thinks we aren't dangerous, but it is ludicrous to compare us with fundamental Islamic terrorists.

Christian war veterans who love their country and support the U.S. military are not so righteous as to believe that the United States is infallible.

I assure Krattenmaker that those who are part of Task Force Patriot USA all are painfully aware of the sin and morality issues within this country. But it is also obvious that God has blessed America, and many of us believe that we are blessed because the USA was built upon Christian principles.